Warning Sticker for Harry
Potter Books?
Religion Today.
March 27, 2001
Not
everyone is under the spell of that phenomenon, "Harry
Potter." The Rev. Robert Frisken, the head of Christian
Community Schools Ltd. and heading a coalition of nearly 100
Christian schools in Australia, is about to write parents, cautioning
them about the books.
He does
not want the stories about the trainee wizard banned, but suggests
the books should carry warning stickers before they are placed in
school libraries. "The ordinary person is typified as being bad
because they have no (magic) powers, and heroes are the people who
are using the occult. Good finds itself in the occult, which is an
inversion of morality for many Christian people."
The four
Harry Potter books have sold more than 30 million copies worldwide
and remain near the top of international bestseller lists three years
after the first one appeared. But the books have become a
controversial addition to classrooms in America - figures show they
were the most challenged books of 1999. Efforts to restrict their
use, or remove them from classrooms and school libraries were
reported in 19 states.
"Woe
to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for
bitter (Isaiah 5:20)." The inverted morality of these popular
books both reflect and fuel our culture's abandonment of Christian
norms. Like all popular culture, they have the ability to influence
-- these especially exert that influence on young children.
Teen Against Violent Video Games
Religion Today.
March 12, 2001
A
13-year-old United Methodist girl from North Bend, Ore., is getting
national attention for her "Cool-No-Violence project," to
prevent children from being exposed to violent video games.
Danielle
Shimotakahara says, "I never thought it would go this far - I
was only trying to educate and convince the businesses around here to
move their violent games to another area of their business, away from
the little kids, or remove them entirely."
She is
featured in the March Reader's Digest as an "everyday hero"
and is in American Girl magazine's April edition, as well as on her
local TV newscasts and on Nickelodeon.
The
project led to her appearance before a U.S. Senate committee, and
giving presentations to civic and community groups, schools and
churches. On Feb. 19, she argued before a Senate committee in favor
of state Senate Bill 59. The bill would require public video game
owners "to ensure that children younger than 18 do not play
games depicting people being shot, or blood gore, mutilation or the
dismemberment of human bodies."
"I'm
surprised at the number of people who never knew these types of
machines were out there ..." she remarked. "My pastor, Pam
Meese, told me that games are supposed to prepare kids for real life
situations," she said. "So what does a game that rips
bodies to pieces and explodes body parts and splatters blood on the
screen teach kids to prepare for in real life?"
It's
great to see a
teen opposed to all this gruesome "entertainment." Her
pastor's comment that this stuff is supposed to be preparing kids for
real life situations is a common cop-out, closely related to
Hollywood's often stated claim that they are merely reflecting
reality. Sadly, they are working to create reality. As one of a
number of influences, many are getting the message. Our reality now
includes desensitized children, teens, and adults slaughtering
people. Are these the "real life" situations we want? (See
Philippians 4:8)
Sex on TV
ABPNews.
Feb 19, 2001
"Sex
on TV: Content and Context" was the second biennial study
conducted by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, an independent
national health-care philanthropy organization based in Menlo Park, Calif.
The study
revealed that the number of programs containing sexual content rose
from 56 percent of all shows in the 1997-98 season, to 68 percent in
the 1999-2000 season. At least one show in four (27 percent) included
sexual behavior, with the remainder featuring conversation about sex.
Television's
preoccupation with sex offers a twisted view of reality, says Bill
Tillman, T. B. Maston professor of Christian ethics at the Logsdon
School of Theology in Abilene, TX. "Sexuality is a major part of
life; still, we are more than sexual beings. Thus, TV media content
proclaims life in an out-of-balance kind of way;" and (he has
noticed) that TV programs he had previously enjoyed have now become
more and more bothersome to his sensibilities.
Sex is
particularly common in primetime network programs - in 1997-98, 67
percent included sexual content, and in 1999-2000, 75 percent.
These
results are not surprising, because they just confirm the truism that
"sex sells," said Joe Haag, special moral-concerns
associate with the Christian Life Commission at the Baptist General
Convention of Texas. While the findings are disturbing, Haag
emphasized that Christians can compliment and support the TV programs
and movies which rise above sexploitation to give a more truthful
account of life.
"We
can express our views to advertisers and producers ... Parents can
monitor and influence their children's TV viewing, or even use the
bad programming as 'teaching moments' for children," he said.
Television
is perhaps the most democratic of mediums. Hollywood gives us what
we watch. The more people watching, the more (or higher priced) ads
sold. To reverse the trend now being seen in shows filled with
questionable content, it will take more than people talking
about it... we need to stop watching. If enough people stop watching
the advertisers will pull out, effectively removing that show from
our entertainment line-up. It's a sad indictment on Christianity when
(regardless of our words) surveys have consistently shown that
professing Christians are still watching all the same things the
world is.
Euthanasia Law
Reuters. April
10, 2001
The Dutch
Senate on Tuesday voted to legalize euthanasia even as thousands of
people demonstrated against making the Netherlands the only country
in the world to permit mercy killing. The vote, recognizing a
practice that has already been tolerated in the Netherlands for over
two decades, was seen as a formality after the lower house of
parliament overwhelmingly approved the bill last November.
Near the
Senate one balaclava-clad man bore a placard saying: "Euthanasia
is still murder." "We believe in the Lord, and he is the
only one who can decide on taking life," said 18-year-old
Henriett Schutta... Many young people took part in the protest
packing a central Hague square. Some held up pictures of Jesus,
others had their faces painted with crosses, but most were soberly dressed.
"It
is dangerous and unworthy for a civilized society if doctors are
allowed to kill. It could put people under pressure to choose
death....," one opposing politician said.
Once the
law comes into effect, the Netherlands will be the only country to
make mercy killing legal. The U.S. state of Oregon allows physician-assisted
suicide. Australia's Northern Territory legalized medically assisted
suicide for terminally ill patients in 1996, although that law was
later repealed. Belgium has agreed on a draft euthanasia law, subject
to approval by parliament, to legalize the practice. Recent polls
have shown 86 percent of the Dutch population supports the move.
The move
has sparked fears that legalizing the practice in the Netherlands
could lead to "death tourism" -- people traveling to the
Netherlands for help in ending their lives. Reports that an
Australian doctor planned to buy a Dutch-registered ship and perform
euthanasia just outside Australian territorial waters were being
investigated by legal experts, Jonquiere said.
Latest
figures from the DVES show there were 3,600 deaths from euthanasia or
assisted suicide in 1995. Data for 1999 are due out soon and are
expected to show a total of around 4,000.
Mankind
has been playing a word game with God's prohibition on murder for
years. Years ago, the Nazi's declared an entire class of people to be
sub(or non)-human, thus giving them legal reason (or tolerance) for
extermination. What is widely decried as an atrocity (and justly so)
from that era, has repeated itself in recent history. First, pre-born
children have been declared to not be human beings, thus paving the
way for their legal extermination (-- now quaintly called
"terminating a pregnancy"). Financial hardship and
inconvenience are two of the most cited reasons for wanting to abort
a child. Most recently, people whose age or physical infirmities have
caused them to not have a "good quality of life," have
become the next victims. It's not surprising that many of those
choosing to die at the hands of their "doctor" have
reported feeling direct or indirect pressure from their family -- not
wanting to be "a burden." What price has human life? How
soon before it becomes legally necessary to die due to old age or
physical infirmity? (See Genesis 1:26, Exodus 20:13, Genesis 9:5-6)
|